I Want Hillary as President (said the Kremlin)!

525px-Uranium_One_logo.svgDo you know anything about Uranium One?

Here’s the way it looks:

Uranium One is the name of a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes all over the world including the western part of the United States. In 2010, the US Regulatory Commission estimated that Uranium One had extraction rights to 20% of the uranium embedded in US soil.

In 2010, ARMZ, a subsidiary of the Russian Nuclear Energy company, acquired a controlling interest in Uranium One. The sale had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. That committee was formed by President Gerald Ford in 1975 and is comprised of several heads of state including the Secretary of State.

In 2010, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State.

According to a New York Times article, there were actually three separate transactions that resulted in greater control of Uranium One and it was during that time that a suspicious flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.  By default, each of those transactions had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment / Hillary Clinton.

Here’s a portion of that article:

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Hillary blames Russian interference for her loss to President Trump despite the fact he defeated her in the Electoral College by a margin of 304 to 227. She recently attempted to smear Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat candidate for President, by insisting that she’s a Russian plant. She references Russian influence in every way shape and form except for the way it most obviously applies: Her own scandals and crimes against the US.

It is possible to minimize the role of Hillary Clinton and even Barack Obama in this scenario to the point where it looks like everything is ethical albeit questionable. But in order to do so, you have to first accept the reality that a material used for the construction of nuclear weapons is being sold to Russia and is being approved by the Oval Office and the Secretary of State.

You can supplement that scenario with as many dynamics and concessions as you wish, but in the end you have a blatant breach of national security made worse by the coincidental financial “contributions” made to the Clinton Foundation.

However you want to process that, if I were a high ranking official in the Russian government and was given the opportunity to influence an election, I would want someone with a track record of deals and compromises that benefit me.

Can you hear that person? Can you hear how they’re defining “Russian Collusion?”

Here it comes…

I want Hillary as President!

Leave a Reply